Polygenic Scores as a Service

Polygenic score infrastructure.Built around care.

From request and sample to validated scoring, interpretation, reporting, and integration — delivered under your brand or ours for preventive, clinical, and research settings.

Configured for the care model around it

End-to-end delivery One operational pathway across intake, laboratory processing, analysis, reporting, and follow-up.
White-label by design Delivered as Starling, co-branded, or embedded within the customer experience and systems.
Data-to-report orchestration Genotyping, imputation, versioned scoring, interpretation, and reporting organised around the intended PRS use.

One PRS backbone for different models of care

Starling adapts the same controlled polygenic-score service to the way each organisation requests, delivers, and uses probabilistic PRS information.

Preventive & longevity care

For longevity clinics, preventive medicine, executive health, and longitudinal health programmes.

PRS screening · prevention · longitudinal follow-up

General & preventive medicine

For general medicine, primary-care groups, and multidisciplinary clinics incorporating polygenic scores into prevention and risk-stratification pathways.

Prevention pathways · risk stratification · professional reporting

Specialist & institutional care

For hospitals, laboratories, private providers, biobanks, and translational research teams.

PRS validation · cohort analysis · integrated reporting

A complete Polygenic Scores as a Service pathway

Every PRS programme follows the same traceable operating model, while data intake, scoring, interpretation, delivery, and integrations remain configurable.

  1. 01

    Request

    Clinical, research, portal, or API-led intake.

  2. 02

    Sample

    Consent, logistics, activation, and tracking.

  3. 03

    Assay

    Fit-for-purpose platform and laboratory route.

  4. 04

    Analysis

    Quality control, bioinformatics, and versioned pipelines.

  5. 05

    Interpretation

    Evidence and context translated for the intended setting.

  6. 06

    Delivery

    Reports, structured data, and system integration.

Security · traceability · version control · quality documentation · evidence management
Explore the platform

Polygenic scores, delivered end to end

The public portfolio is focused on PRS and PGS. Each module supports a different part of the same controlled path from programme design to reporting and integration.

01
Intended use

Programme & pathway design

Define population, intended use, evidence boundaries, consent, reporting roles, and implementation requirements before scoring begins.

02
Sample or data

Genotyping & data intake

Work from a qualified genotyping route or controlled customer genotype data, with identity, format, coverage, and sample-quality checks.

03
Comparable input

Imputation & harmonisation

Versioned reference panels and controlled harmonisation create the variant coverage required by the selected score models.

04
PRS / PGS

Versioned polygenic scoring

Selected models run through transparent, versioned pipelines with allele alignment, model checks, score calculation, and traceable provenance.

05
Evidence in context

Interpretation & validation

Scores are interpreted against calibration, ancestry, reference populations, published evidence, and the clinical or research context.

06
White-label delivery

Reporting & integration

Recipient, professional, technical, and structured outputs can be delivered under your brand and returned to the systems your organisation uses.

From analysis to reporting in your care model

See how Starling translates polygenic scores into a visual recipient layer, professional interpretation, model-level QC, and structured output for your organisation.

Starling Genomics · Fictional demonstration data · configurable B2B output

Heart & circulation · at a glance

Inherited predisposition

2 elevated of 4
Hypertension Position 94 out of 100

High

Your position
Lower inherited predispositionHigher inherited predisposition

Of 100 people, about 94 have a lower or equal inherited predisposition and 6 have a higher predisposition.

Model comparison
1.72x
Coverage
100%
Coronary artery disease Position 93 out of 100

High

Your position
Lower inherited predispositionHigher inherited predisposition

Of 100 people, about 93 have a lower or equal inherited predisposition and 7 have a higher predisposition.

Model comparison
2.12x
Coverage
100%
Stroke Position 39 out of 100

Not elevated

Your position
Lower inherited predispositionHigher inherited predisposition

Of 100 people, about 39 have a lower or equal inherited predisposition and 61 have a higher predisposition.

Model comparison
0.96x
Coverage
100%
Atrial fibrillation Position 17 out of 100

Not elevated

Your position
Lower inherited predispositionHigher inherited predisposition

Of 100 people, about 17 have a lower or equal inherited predisposition and 83 have a higher predisposition.

Model comparison
0.63x
Coverage
100%

Detailed results

Heart & circulation

4 scores

Read the result in three steps: percentile shows relative position, model comparison summarises the published association, and coverage confirms whether the required variants passed pipeline checks. None of these is a diagnosis.

Heart & circulation

Coronary artery disease (CAD)

High
93Position 93 out of 100
Your position
Lower inherited predispositionHigher inherited predisposition

Of 100 people, about 93 have a lower or equal inherited predisposition and 7 have a higher predisposition.

What this means

This fictional result places the individual near the 93rd percentile of the stated reference population. It indicates relatively higher inherited predisposition and should be interpreted alongside age, blood pressure, cholesterol, family history, and the intended care pathway.

PRS_CAD · vJ.01Coverage 100%Z-score +1.48
ADMIX reference context
Model comparison 2.12x
AUC 0.735 · QC Pass

Reporting and white label

One score, four interpretation layers

Configurable

The same PRS result can be explained differently for recipients, care professionals, technical reviewers, and connected systems without changing the underlying model output.

Recipient layer

A percentile visual, plain-language meaning, and an explicit reminder that PRS describes probability rather than diagnosis.

Professional layer

Score position, model comparison, family and clinical context, and considerations for qualified follow-up.

Technical and QC layer

Model identifier, genome build, ancestry context, coverage, validation metrics, pipeline version, and traceability.

Structured-data layer

Selected PRS fields can return to an EHR, LIMS, data warehouse, or research environment through controlled interfaces.

White-label presentation

The same controlled layers can be presented in your brand, language, portal, and reporting workflow.

Three design questions for every implementation

What is the intended use?

Risk stratification, prevention, research, or another clearly scoped PRS pathway.

Who receives which information?

Concise explanations for recipients, professional interpretation for care providers, and technical detail for authorised teams.

Where should the result land?

In a report, portal, customer system, dataset, or a combination of these.

Professional appendix

Model, performance & QC

GRCh38

Transparent model-level metrics for professional review.

All checks passed
Condition / modelPRSEffectValidationCoverageQC
HypertensionPRS_BP · v2026.1 94z +1.56 1.72xper SD 0.716AUC 100% Pass
Coronary artery diseasePRS_CAD · v2026.1 93z +1.48 2.12xper SD 0.735AUC 100% Pass
StrokePRS_STR · v2026.1 39z -0.27 0.96xper SD 0.701AUC 100% Pass
Atrial fibrillationPRS_AF · v2026.1 17z -1.15 0.63xper SD 0.759AUC 100% Pass

A delivery model that fits the organisation

The experience can be visibly Starling, co-branded, or embedded behind the customer brand while the scientific and operational foundation remains controlled.

Starling

Starling-branded reports and service experience.

Co-branded

A shared clinical or programme identity.

White-label

Customer-branded portals, reports, and delivery.

Configurable experience

  • Brand and domain
  • Languages and report layers
  • Order and notification flows
  • Delivery formats and integrations

Controlled foundation

  • Quality control
  • Traceability and audit trail
  • Evidence and version management
  • Security and data governance

Technology and service relationships

We combine genotyping, laboratory, and PRS analytics capabilities according to intended use, sample type, scale, and implementation setting.

Design a PRS workflow around your organisation

Contact